Go to the reading
Neurotech

Return to the original question

This reading list identifies the publications behind our explanations. A reference establishes where an observation was reported; its study population and method determine how far that observation can travel.

Explore the Semax and Selank blend at Promise Peptides

Neurotech Peptides may earn money when readers become Promise patients.

Read the setting with the finding

Rat tissue, isolated serum, a brain scan and an anxiety rating answer different questions. The entries below identify those settings alongside the publication. Where a clinical abstract does not describe randomization or blinding, that uncertainty remains relevant even if its conclusion sounds confident.

  1. Semax and a nerve-cell support protein

    Dolotov and colleagues, 2006. Rat basal-forebrain protein and binding experiments; this is animal research.

    DOI 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03658.x

  2. Selank and GABA-related gene activity

    Volkova and colleagues, 2016. Rat frontal-cortex gene measurements, rather than human anxiety outcomes.

    DOI 10.3389/fphar.2016.00031

  3. Two peptides in a serum enzyme experiment

    Kost and colleagues, 2001. Human serum outside the body; not a patient treatment trial.

    DOI 10.1023/a:1011373002885

  4. Selank in an anxiety comparison

    Zozulia and colleagues, 2008. Russian clinical report with 62 patients; no placebo arm, randomization and blinding not stated in the abstract.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18454096/

  5. Selank added to another anxiety medicine

    Medvedev and colleagues, 2015. Russian report with 70 patients; add-on comparison without placebo; randomization not stated in the abstract.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26356395/

  6. The first DSIP characterization

    Schoenenberger and Monnier, 1977. Rabbit experiments relating the isolated peptide to electrical sleep patterns.

    DOI 10.1073/pnas.74.3.1282

  7. A critical account of DSIP biology

    Kovalzon and Strekalova, 2006. Review of unresolved mechanism and weak support for the proposed sleep role.

    DOI 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03693.x

  8. An early human DSIP sleep experiment

    Schneider-Helmert and colleagues, 1981. Six participants with chronic insomnia; a small early investigation using intravenous administration.

    DOI 10.1007/BF01971753

  9. FDA’s evaluation of Semax substances

    FDA staff briefing prepared for July 2026. A scientific and regulatory assessment, not a final rule or an advisory-panel vote record.

    https://www.fda.gov/media/193348/download

  10. Semax alongside stroke rehabilitation care

    Gusev and colleagues, 2018. Russian report with 110 patients; randomization and blinding not described in the abstract.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29798983/

  11. A small Semax brain-imaging comparison

    Lebedeva and colleagues, 2018. Healthy volunteers: 14 receiving Semax and ten placebo; imaging measurements rather than everyday memory testing.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30225715/

  12. FDA’s peptide safety concerns

    FDA page current as of April 22, 2026. Withdrawn nominations remain accompanied by safety concerns; withdrawal is not clearance.

    https://www.fda.gov/drugs/human-drug-compounding/certain-bulk-drug-substances-use-compounding-may-present-significant-safety-risks

  13. FDA on compounded medicines

    FDA explains the absence of premarket review of compounded drugs for safety, effectiveness and quality.

    https://www.fda.gov/drugs/human-drug-compounding/understanding-risks-compounded-drugs

  14. A later double-blind DSIP insomnia study

    Schneider-Helmert, 1992. Research in people with chronic insomnia reported modest effects of limited clinical importance.

    DOI 10.1159/000118919

An adult lying awake at dawn, looking toward a softly lit window from a cream pillow.
An awake adult rests on cream bedding in the early window light.

Regulatory context and access

The FDA’s peptide safety page, current as of April 22, 2026, places Semax, Selank acetate and DSIP in its table of withdrawn nominations. Withdrawal does not establish clearance, approval or permission to compound. The safety concerns printed beside those entries remain part of the record; the page does not give a substance-specific withdrawal date.

Promise Peptides currently provides a U.S. prescribing route through licensed U.S. providers who review each request. A review can determine that a person is ineligible; availability depends on state and treatment. Licensed U.S. compounding pharmacies prepare prescriptions. The medicines described here are compounded and are not FDA-approved.

LegitScript certification does not confer FDA approval or answer a clinical evidence question. Our access guide explains the different roles, while the research guide follows the limitations in the studies themselves.

Research can inform a review without deciding it

For the clinical route described here, Promise Peptides connects U.S. patients with licensed U.S. providers. Eligibility and a prescribing decision remain individual.

Explore the Promise Peptides treatment directory